Farmer Interest Groups: an effective pathway for enhancing agricultural production, productivity and profitability

  • B S Khadda ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahal, (CIAH) Vejalpur, Godhra, (Gujarat) 389 340
  • K Lata
  • R Kumar ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahal, (CIAH) Vejalpur, Godhra, (Gujarat) 389 340
  • A K Rai ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahal, (CIAH) Vejalpur, Godhra, (Gujarat) 389 340
  • S Khajuria ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra- Panchmahal, (CIAH) Vejalpur, Godhra, (Gujarat) 389 340
  • Y G Patel ATMA Project, Panchmahal
  • S K Varia ATMA Project, Panchmahal
  • A D Rathva ATMA Project, Panchmahal

Abstract

The present study was conducted to assess the impact of Farmers’ Interest Groups on transfer of technologies and enhancing agricultural production, productivity and profitability of farming community of Panchmahal district of central Gujarat, India.  For impact assessment study, 10 FIGs were selected randomly from different villages of Kalol and Goghmba taluka of Panchmahal district. The results of present study revealed that the mean adoption level of scientific crop and dairy production technologies was found to be greater (82.53 MPS and 81.51 MPS) for the member of Farmer Interest Groups after technological interventions of KVK, Panchmahal as compared to the non-FIG members (54.47 MPS and 36.65 MPS), respectively. The overall difference in adoption level of scientific crop and dairy farming technologies of FIGs members and non FIG members was found to be 27.98 and 44.87 MPS, respectively. During the period of study, it was observed that the crop and dairy production under FIG recorded the higher yield than existing farmers' practices. The percentage increase in yield was recorded 21.50 percent in milk production of cow to 58.72 percent in lucerne production over existing farmers' practices. Based on the study, it may be inferred that the formation of Farmer Interest Groups (FIGs) has been highly beneficial to farmers. After realizing the benefits of FIGs, the beneficiary members were more active in participation, meetings and adoption of improved agriculture and animal husbandry technologies. Therefore, there is a need to bring out a comprehensive policy with institutional framework and adequate incentives for promotion of FIGs for crops -livestock based farming system in the country which will not only be helpful in agriculture and livestock production but also improve the socio-economic conditions of the farming community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Y G Patel, ATMA Project, Panchmahal

Deputy Project Director

S K Varia, ATMA Project, Panchmahal

Block Technology Manager

A D Rathva, ATMA Project, Panchmahal

Block Technology Manager

References

Ashby JA, Braun Ann R & Gracia T. 2000. Investing in Farmers as Researchers: Experience with Local Agricultural Research Committees in Latin America. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Cali, Columbia. Pp-199.
Brahma S, Phookan DB, Kachari M, Hazarika TK & Das K. 2010. Growth, yield and economics of broccoli under different levels of nitrogen fertigation. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 67: 279–82.
Chauhan NM & Pandya C D. 2012. Impact and yield crack analysis of trainings and FLDs regarding scientific practices of Gram. Agriculture Update, 7(3&4): 199-202.
Dhaka BL, Meena BS & Suwalka RL. 2010. Popularization of Improved Maize Production Technology through Frontline Demonstrations in South-eastern Rajasthan. Journal of Agriculture Science, 1(1): 39-42.
GOI. 2013. Annual report, 2013-2014. Department of agriculture and cooperation, Ministry of agriculture and farmer welfare, Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi-110 001.
Hellin J, Lundy M & Meijer M. 2009. 'Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso- America', Food Policy, 34(1): 16-22.
Khadda BS, Lata K, Kumar R., Jadav JK & Rai AK & Khajuria S. 2014. Efficacy of technological intervention on production potential of diversified farming system in Panchmahals district, Gujarat. Indian Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 84 (12): 1531–6.
Khadda BS, Lata K, Kumar R, Jadav JK & Khajuria S. 2016. Effect of supplementary feeding on productive and reproductive performance of milch buffalo and feed economics under field conditions in Panchmahal district of Central Gujarat. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology, 2: 51-56.
Khadda BS, Lata K & Kumar R. 2019. Efficacy of pashu chocolate on milk production and reproductive performance lactating buffalo under field conditions of semi arid region. Progressive Research – An International Journal, 14 (Special-I): 651-655.
Kumawat SR. 2008. Impact of frontline demonstration on adoption of improved caster production technology. Rajasthan Journal of Extension Education, 16:143-147.
Kumar A, Kumar R, Yadav VPS & Kumar R. 2010. Impact Assessment of Frontline Demonstrations of Bajra in Haryana State. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 10(1): 105-108.
Manalili AG. 1990. Community organizing for people's empowerment. A book published by Manila: Kapativan Kaunlaran Foundation. Pp-197.
Meena KC. 2011. An impact assessment of frontline demonstrations (FLDs) on soybean growers, Rajasthan Journal of Extension Education, 19 : 133-138.
Murai AS & Singh BK. 2011. Differential adoption of scientific dairy farming practices and related constraints. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 11 (2): 46–9.
Patel N & Rajput TBS. 2003. Yield response of some vegetable crops to different levels of fertigation. Annals of Agricultural Research, 24: 542–5.
Patel BI, Patel DB, Patel AJ & Vihol KH. 2009. Performance of mustard in Banskantha district of Gujarat. Journal of Oilseed Research, 26 (Special issue): 556- 557.
Paredes M. 2001. We are like fingers on the same hand: Peasants' heterogeneity at the interface with technology and project intervention in Carchi, Ecuador. (M. Sc., Wageningen University, The Netherlands). 150pp.
Sathiadhas R. Noble D & Immanuel S. 2003. Adoption level of scientific dairy farming practices by IVLP farmers in the coastal agro ecosystem of Kerala. Indian Journal of Social Research 44 (3): 243–50.
Singh K & Srinivasan R. 1998. Role of Farmers’ Organization in the Context of New Economic Policy with Particular Reference to Agriculture Marketing and Agro- Processing. Indian Journal of Agriculture Marketing, (Conf. Spl.), 12(3):161-164.
Singh D, Choudhary MK, Meena ML & Kumar C. 2018. Farmer field school: An innovative approach for boosting spice production in semi arid zone. International Journal of Seed Spices, 8(2), July 2018:64-71.
Yadav GS, Chandan D, Datta M, Ngachan SV, Yadav JS & Babu S. 2013. Comparative evaluation of traditional and improved farming practices in Tripura. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 83 (3): 310- 14.
Yishak G & Panjabi NK. 2011. Determinants of adoption of improved maize technology in Damot Gale, Wolaita, Ethiopia. Rajasthan Journal of Extension Education, 19:1-9.
Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
KHADDA, B S et al. Farmer Interest Groups: an effective pathway for enhancing agricultural production, productivity and profitability. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology, [S.l.], v. 11, p. 58-68, june 2021. ISSN 2456-9410. Available at: <https://journals.saaer.org.in/index.php/jae/article/view/374>. Date accessed: 24 sep. 2021.
Keywords
Adoption, crop, dairy farming, fig, impact, respondents